Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is much better than the LG Q7, getting a score of 82.9 against 72.2. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has the previous 11 version while LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Google Pixel 4a body is much newer, a little thinner and just a bit lighter than the LG Q7.
Google Pixel 4a has a bit sharper display than LG Q7, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit bigger display. Google Pixel 4a has more memory to install applications and games than LG Q7, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit faster CPU than LG Q7, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a takes slightly better pictures and videos than LG Q7, because although it has a camera in the back with less MP, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments, a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Google Pixel 4a has a bit better battery performance than LG Q7, because it has a 5 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.