Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is way better than the LG Q7's global score of 72.2. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is notably newer and a little thinner, but also heavier than LG Q7. These phones use Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version while LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than LG Q7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little sharper display than LG Q7, because although it has a quite inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit larger display.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a better storage capacity for games and applications than LG Q7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has longer battery life than LG Q7, because it has a 3885mAh battery size. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much better camera than LG Q7, because although it has a worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a way higher video quality, a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.