Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2024-03-22 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Metal | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 439 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.64 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a lot better than the LG Q7, with a global score of 92.1 against 72.2. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's construction is way newer, but notably heavier and a little thicker than LG Q7. These phones work with Android OS, but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has an older 14 version and LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a greater processing power than LG Q7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a greater amount of RAM. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has an incredibly better looking display than LG Q7, because it has a bigger display, a higher 1280 x 2800 pixels resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a lot better camera than LG Q7, because it has a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs, a lot better (4K) video resolution, a back camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution and a way bigger aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than LG Q7, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much better battery performance than LG Q7, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.