Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.0 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 439 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a score of 77.7, which is slightly better than the LG Q7's overall score of 72.2. HTC One M9's design is extremely older, a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than LG Q7. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the HTC One M9 has the previous 5.0 version and LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The HTC One M9 features a much better looking screen than LG Q7, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch. HTC One M9 has a quite better processing power than LG Q7, and although they both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount, the HTC One M9 also has a 64-bit CPU and an extra graphics co-processor.
The LG Q7 counts with a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal memory, the LG Q7 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. HTC One M9 takes better pictures and videos than LG Q7, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the HTC One M9 also has a much bigger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality, a much better resolution back-facing camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
LG Q7 counts with a bit superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.