Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-06-15 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is better than the LG Q7's 72.2 overall score. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has an older 8.0 Oreo version and LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Even though the LG V30S ThinQ and LG Q7 were released only 3 months apart, LG V30S ThinQ's construction is just a little heavier but also thinner.
LG V30S ThinQ features just a little better performance than LG Q7, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little more vivid screen than LG Q7, because it has a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution, a little bit bigger display and a little bit greater pixels density.
LG V30S ThinQ features a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than LG Q7, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V30S ThinQ shoots a bit better videos and photos than LG Q7, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, it also counts with a much larger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments, a camera with more MP and a much higher video resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit longer battery duration than LG Q7, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.