Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-15 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is better than the LG Q7, getting a overall score of 81.3 against 72.2. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is thinner but a bit heavier than the LG Q7, and both were released only a couple months apart. The LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better looking screen than LG Q7, because it has a bit higher pixels density, a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a quite bigger display.
LG V35 ThinQ features a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG Q7, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a quite better processing power than LG Q7, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit longer battery lifetime than LG Q7, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ captures better videos and photos than LG Q7, because although it has a tinier camera sensor, it also counts with a more megapixels camera in the back, a much bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments and a much better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.