Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is much better than LG Q7, having an 81.2 score against 72.2. Although LG V40 ThinQ and the LG Q7 were released with only a few months difference, LG V40 ThinQ's body is just a bit thinner but heavier. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version while LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
LG V40 ThinQ features a little sharper display than LG Q7, because it has a bigger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a just a bit greater number of pixels in each inch of display. LG V40 ThinQ has a quite superior processing power than LG Q7, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than LG Q7, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much larger aperture, a way better video definition and a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos. LG V40 ThinQ features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than LG Q7, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better battery duration than LG Q7, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.