Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is much better than the LG Q7, getting an 86.3 score against 72.2. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro design is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner than the LG Q7's, but it is also extremely heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an older 14 version while LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than LG Q7, because although it has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger screen. LG Q7 has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Q7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a greater camera than LG Q7, because it has a way bigger aperture, a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera, a way higher video definition and a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality photographs.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than LG Q7, because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.