Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than the LG Q7's 72.2 global score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is notably newer than LG Q7's, although it's a bit thicker and notably heavier. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version while LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better looking display than LG Q7, because although it has a little bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. LG Q7 features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than LG Q7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than LG Q7, because it has a way bigger aperture, a lot better video quality, a much more megapixels back camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior battery duration than LG Q7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.