Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the LG Q7, getting a overall score of 87 against 72.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola razr (2020) has an older 11 version and LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Although Motorola razr (2020) is way heavier than LG Q7, it's a little thinner and newer.
The LG Q7 features a little sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a just a little better display density. The Motorola razr (2020) features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Q7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) has a bit faster processing unit than LG Q7, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 5 GB more RAM. Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior camera than LG Q7, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a lot larger sensor, a much larger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations and a much better (4K) video quality.
LG Q7 features a bit better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 7% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.