Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-15 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber shade |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a global score of 75.8, which is slightly better than the LG Q7's general score of 72.2. Nubia Red Magic 3S's construction is newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than the LG Q7. These phones have Android operating system, but nubia Red Magic 3S has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo version, counting with some nice extra features and enhanced performance.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a display that's just as good as the LG Q7 one, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bigger display. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a better performing CPU than LG Q7, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S takes much clearer pictures and videos than LG Q7, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs, a way more megapixels camera and a way bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than LG Q7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior battery lifetime than LG Q7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.