Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Sonic silver |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a global score of 76.2, which is slightly better than LG Q7's score of 72.2. Both of these devices have Android OS, but nubia Red Magic 5S has an older 10 version and LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo. Nubia Red Magic 5S is a incredibly newer cellphone than the LG Q7, but it is thicker and way heavier.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a little sharper screen than LG Q7, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a quite better processing power than LG Q7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a greater camera than LG Q7, because it has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back, a much larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a better storage to store more games and applications than LG Q7, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a superior battery duration than LG Q7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.