Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 is much better than LG Q7, having a general score of 81.3 against 72.2. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy A31 has older 10 version while LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Galaxy A31 is a newer cellphone than the LG Q7, but it's noticeably heavier and just a bit thicker.
Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a little bit better performance than LG Q7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG Q7 and Galaxy A31 feature quite similar screens, because although the Galaxy A31 has a little bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A31 shoots much better videos and photos than LG Q7, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A31 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos, a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a camera with a much better 48 MP resolution.
The Galaxy A31 has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than LG Q7, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a way better battery duration than LG Q7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.