Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-15 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is better than LG Q7's 72.2 score. The Galaxy A50 is a newer and just a little thinner cellphone than the LG Q7, although it is also somewhat heavier. Galaxy A50 features a display that's very similar to LG Q7's screen, because although the Galaxy A50 has a quite worse pixels count per display inch, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger display.
Galaxy A50 has a little better hardware performance than LG Q7, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A50 also has more RAM. The Galaxy A50 counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than LG Q7, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features longer battery lifetime than LG Q7, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A50 captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG Q7, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot more MP camera and a much larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.