Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than LG Q7, having an 85.5 score against 72.2. Samsung Galaxy A51 is a newer and a bit thinner phone than the LG Q7, but it's also somewhat heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version and LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features a bit better processing power than LG Q7, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has 1 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a display that's very similar to the LG Q7 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen.
Galaxy A51 features a much better camera than LG Q7, because it has a much larger camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture, a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a way higher (4K) video resolution. The Galaxy A51 features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than LG Q7, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A51 counts with longer battery duration than LG Q7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.