Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the LG Q7, having a 90.8 score against 72.2. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a newer cellphone than LG Q7, but it's a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version while LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Galaxy A51 5G and LG Q7 count with really similar screens, because although the Galaxy A51 5G has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger display. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG Q7, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better CPU than LG Q7, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than LG Q7, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G shoots way better photographs and videos than LG Q7, because it has a way more MP back-facing camera, a way larger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.