Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a lot better than LG Q7, having an 87.5 score against 72.2. Samsung Galaxy A71 is a newer and just a bit thinner device than LG Q7, although it is somewhat heavier. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has the older 11 version while LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The LG Q7 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a little higher pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a bit better processing unit than LG Q7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than LG Q7, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 has a way better battery duration than LG Q7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 captures much better photos and videos than LG Q7, because it has a larger aperture, a way higher video resolution, a lot higher resolution back camera and a much bigger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.