Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is much better than LG Q7's 72.2 score. Galaxy A71 5G UW is a much heavier cellphone than LG Q7, but both of them are equally thin. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version and LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a screen that is very similar to LG Q7's display, because although the Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit more powerful processor than LG Q7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a lot better camera than LG Q7, because it has a lot better resolution back facing camera, a bigger aperture, a much bigger camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos and a way better video quality. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than LG Q7, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better battery duration than LG Q7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.