Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-15 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the LG Q7, getting a score of 97.6 against 72.2. Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is heavier than the LG Q7, it's thinner and newer. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo, so it provides a lot of extra features and enhanced performance.
Galaxy Fold features a more powerful processing unit than LG Q7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. The LG Q7 features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a really smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better screen pixels density.
Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than LG Q7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Fold shoots much better photographs and videos than LG Q7, because although it has a less MP camera in the back, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition, a much bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and a bigger sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a way better battery life than LG Q7, because it has a 46% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.