Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-15 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is way better than LG Q7's score of 72.2. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G design is newer and just a little bit thinner than the LG Q7's, although it is also way heavier. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the previous 11 version while LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a bit better looking display than LG Q7, because it has a quite better amount of pixels in each inch in the screen, a bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG Q7, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a superior CPU than LG Q7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM. Galaxy S10 5G features a better camera than LG Q7, because although it has a back facing camera with less mega-pixels, it also counts with a much larger aperture, a lot higher video resolution and a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG Q7, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.