Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-15 | -- |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 5.11 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.64 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is better than LG Q7, having an 82.6 score against 72.2. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but Galaxy S25 has the previous 14 version while LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo. Galaxy S25's construction is incredibly thinner and much lighter than LG Q7. Samsung Galaxy S25 features a much better looking display than LG Q7, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a better memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG Q7, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The LG Q7 has a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S25 captures much clearer videos and photos than LG Q7, because it has a lot bigger back camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality, a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light images and video and a much better 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features greater battery lifetime than LG Q7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.