Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is much better than LG Q7's 72.2 global score. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip construction is newer and somewhat thinner than the LG Q7's, but it is much heavier.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a better performance than LG Q7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better screen than LG Q7, because although it has a little bit worse count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes better photographs and videos than LG Q7, because although it has a worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and video, a way better video resolution and a larger sensor providing a better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much better memory to store more games and applications than LG Q7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit superior battery lifetime than LG Q7, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.