Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is a lot better than LG Q7's overall score of 72.2. Even though Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot heavier than LG Q7, it's thinner and also notably newer. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version while LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more vivid screen than LG Q7, because although it has a bit inferior amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a larger screen. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than LG Q7, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a superior hardware performance than LG Q7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 5 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG Q7, because it has a 10 percent larger battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a superior camera than LG Q7, because although it has a lower 12 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and photos, a bigger camera aperture and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.