Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-15 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than LG Q7's 72.2 global score. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than LG Q7's, although it's noticeably heavier. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version and LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a greater hardware performance than LG Q7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a display that's just as good as the LG Q7 one, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a quite worse pixel density, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208px and a really bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes much better pictures and videos than LG Q7, because although it has a camera with less mega-pixels, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photos and video, a much better (4K) video quality and a lot larger sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has much more storage to store more games and applications than LG Q7, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior battery lifetime than LG Q7, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.