Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 398 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is just a bit better than the LG Q70, having a overall score of 82 against 77.9. The Apple iPhone XR body is a little bit lighter than the LG Q70, but it is just a little thicker and was released just 19 months before. The Apple iPhone XR counts with a slightly better looking display than LG Q70, although it has a lot worse resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels, a quite inferior number of pixels per inch of screen and a bit smaller display.
The LG Q70 has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XR, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Q70 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Apple iPhone XR has a superior CPU than LG Q70, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The LG Q70 features greater battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2942mAh. LG Q70 takes a little bit better photos and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller sensor shooting lower quality photographs and videos, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Q70 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Q70. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the LG Q70, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.