Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is a bit better than LG Q70, with an 80.2 score against 77.9. Despite of the fact Google Pixel is way older and just a bit thicker than LG Q70, it's design is still notably lighter. The Google Pixel has a slightly better looking screen than LG Q70, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better number of pixels in each inch of screen.
The LG Q70 features a little faster processor than Google Pixel, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the LG Q70 also has a greater number of cores. The LG Q70 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking lower quality videos and images, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the LG Q70 also counts with a much higher 32 megapixels resolution camera and a larger aperture to take better photos in low light environments.
LG Q70 has much more storage for apps and games than Google Pixel, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Google Pixel is also a bit cheaper, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.