Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a little bit better than LG Q70, getting an 82.5 score against 77.9. Despite of the fact that Google Pixel 2 XL is much older than the LG Q70, it's design is lighter and just a little bit thinner. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit superior processing unit than LG Q70. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a little more vivid screen than LG Q70, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution. The LG Q70 has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG Q70 counts with a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3520mAh. The LG Q70 counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG Q70 also counts with a back camera with a much higher 32 MP resolution.
The Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.