Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than LG Q70, getting a score of 80 against 77.9. Although the Google Pixel 3 is older than LG Q70, it's construction is a little thinner and lighter. Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better performance than LG Q70. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores.
Google Pixel 3 has just a bit better looking display than LG Q70, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a bit better number of pixels per screen inch. The LG Q70 features a much greater memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG Q70 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG Q70 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same camera aperture, the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG Q70 also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
LG Q70 has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.