Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has an overall score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than LG Q70's overall score of 77.9. The Google Pixel 3 XL design is just a bit thinner and a bit lighter than LG Q70, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. Google Pixel 3 XL has just a little better processing power than LG Q70. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a bit better screen than LG Q70, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2960px resolution. LG Q70 counts with a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG Q70 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG Q70 takes clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller sensor taking lower quality photos and videos, and they both have the same aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG Q70 also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
The LG Q70 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3430mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3 XL is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.