Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-07 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a score of 78.8, which is slightly better than LG Q70's 77.9 overall score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Google Pixel 3a has a more recent 11 version and LG Q70 has Android 10 version, so it gives a lot of extra features and a performance increase. The Google Pixel 3a body has the same thickness than LG Q70, but it is way lighter.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a CPU that is just as good as LG Q70's CPU, they have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Google Pixel 3a counts with just a bit better looking display than LG Q70, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2220 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density.
The LG Q70 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Q70 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The LG Q70 has a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Q70 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Q70 has improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.