Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Mirror black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than LG Q70, with a general score of 81.9 against 77.9. The Google Pixel 4 is a somewhat lighter device than LG Q70, but both are 0.32inches thick. Google Pixel 4 counts with a little faster processor than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 has a little more vivid screen than LG Q70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a just a little better count of pixels per screen inch. The LG Q70 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking images and video in poorly lited environments and a smaller back camera sensor taking worse quality pictures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG Q70 also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The LG Q70 counts with a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Q70 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG Q70 features a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 4 is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.