Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Mirror black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is just a bit better than LG Q70, having a global score of 82.9 against 77.9. The Google Pixel 4 XL design has the same thickness than the LG Q70, but it is just a little bit lighter. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better looking screen than LG Q70, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
LG Q70 features much more memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Q70 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit more powerful processor than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG Q70 has a bit superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an 8% more battery capacity. LG Q70 features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing images or videos in low-light situations and a smaller back camera sensor taking worse quality photographs, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the LG Q70 also counts with a lot higher 32 mega pixels resolution camera.
Google Pixel 4 XL costs more money than the LG Q70, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.