Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-07 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mirror black | Just black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has an overall score of 82.9, which is a bit better than LG Q70's overall score of 77.9. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has newer 11 version while LG Q70 has Android 10 version, giving some extra features. Google Pixel 4a's design has the same thickness than the LG Q70, but it is lighter.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a little sharper screen than LG Q70, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixels count per screen inch and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Google Pixel 4a features just a bit better hardware performance than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a also has more RAM.
The LG Q70 counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video and a tinier sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG Q70 also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera.
LG Q70 has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG Q70 counts with longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 27 percent more battery size.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Google Pixel 4a is also the cheapest one, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.