Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Mirror black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is much better than LG Q70's overall score of 77.9. Google Pixel 5's body is a little thinner and way lighter than LG Q70, even though both were released only a few months apart. Google Pixel 5 features a little faster processing unit than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 5 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 has a little sharper display than LG Q70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixel count in each screen inch and a quite better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The LG Q70 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse video frame rates, a smaller back camera sensor giving a lower image quality and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG Q70 also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
LG Q70 has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit superior battery life than LG Q70, because it has a 4080mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Google Pixel 5 costs a lot more than LG Q70, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.