Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-05-07 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 398 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Q70 has a score of 77.9, which is a little bit better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 score. Although the LG Q70 is noticeably heavier than HTC One M9, it's thinner and way newer. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the LG Q70 has newer 10 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it provides the user some additional features and a performance increase.
HTC One M9 has a better looking display than LG Q70, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density. The LG Q70 has a much better memory for apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
HTC One M9 counts with a bit superior CPU than LG Q70, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64 bits CPU. The LG Q70 has a much longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
LG Q70 counts with a bit better camera than HTC One M9, because although it has a tinier sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG Q70 also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and a way more MP camera.
Although LG Q70 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HTC One M9. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the LG Q70, otherwise you can save some money and get the HTC One M9, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.