Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mirror black | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 398 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG Q70 is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra, getting a global score of 77.9 against 77. Even though LG Q70 is extremely newer than HTC U Ultra, it's heavier and a little bit thicker. The HTC U Ultra has a little more vivid display than LG Q70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
HTC U Ultra counts with as much memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the LG Q70, both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG Q70 has a little bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the LG Q70 also has a larger number of cores.
The LG Q70 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG Q70 also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution.
The LG Q70 counts with longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 33% larger battery size.
The LG Q70 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.