Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 398 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG Q70 is slightly better than the HTC U11, getting a 77.9 score against 77.6. The LG Q70 design is noticeably newer, but heavier and just a little thicker than HTC U11. The HTC U11 counts with a bit superior CPU than LG Q70. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory. HTC U11 counts with a bit better screen than LG Q70, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels count per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
LG Q70 has a bit better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier sensor and a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG Q70 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera.
The LG Q70 features a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than HTC U11, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG Q70 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 features improved battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although LG Q70 is a better device, it is more expensive than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC U11. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the HTC U11, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.