Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.2 |
| 2020-05-07 | 2014-05-27 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.26 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black, Gold, Pink, Purple and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 350.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 398 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 548 hours standby time 19 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Q70 has a general score of 77.9, which is slightly better than LG G3's 76.4 score. The LG Q70 body is way newer and a little bit thinner, but much heavier than the LG G3. These devices use Android operating system, but the LG Q70 has newer 10 version and LG G3 has Android 5.0 version. LG G3 counts with just a little better performance than LG Q70, because although it has less cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
The LG G3 features a much more vibrant display than LG Q70, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and more pixels per inch of screen. The LG Q70 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than LG G3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Q70 also has a way bigger aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments, a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos and a way better resolution back-facing camera.
LG Q70 counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than LG G3, because it has 32 GB more internal memory and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Q70 features improved battery lifetime than LG G3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG Q70 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG G3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G3. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG G3, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.