Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-07 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Mirror black | Aurora black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a global score of 82.7, which is a little bit better than LG Q70's 77.9 global score. LG G8X ThinQ's construction is a bit lighter but just a little thicker than LG Q70, and both were only released with a few months difference. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system).
The LG G8X ThinQ has a bit better processing unit than LG Q70, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better looking screen than LG Q70, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a little better screen density and a slightly better 1080 x 2340px resolution.
The LG Q70 counts with a slightly better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Q70 also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than LG Q70, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more internal storage capacity. The LG G8X ThinQ's battery life is just as good as LG Q70's battery duration.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG G8X ThinQ is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.