Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-07 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mirror black | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than the LG Q70, having an 82.5 score against 77.9. LG V30S ThinQ is an way older phone than the LG Q70, but LG was able to build it lighter and a bit thinner anyway. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and LG Q70 has Android 10.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit faster processor than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V30S ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than LG Q70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a better pixels density.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Q70, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage. LG Q70 features greater battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
The LG Q70 has a slightly better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light photography, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG Q70 also counts with a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Q70. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy LG Q70, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.