Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than LG Q70, with an 81.3 score against 77.9. The LG V35 ThinQ is an older phone than LG Q70, but LG could make it just a little thinner and a lot lighter. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than LG Q70, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better looking screen than LG Q70, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better pixel number in each inch of display. LG Q70 shoots slightly better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG Q70 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 32 mega-pixels resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with as much storage capacity for games and applications as the LG Q70 one, they have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and exactly the same internal memory capacity. LG Q70 counts with better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.