Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mirror black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than LG Q70, with a overall score of 87.1 against 77.9. The LG Velvet construction is just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than LG Q70, although both of them were released with only 0 months difference. LG Velvet features a bit more vivid display than LG Q70, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2460px resolution and a bit larger screen.
LG Velvet has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Velvet also has more RAM memory. The LG Velvet features a slightly better camera than LG Q70, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG Velvet also has a much more mega-pixels camera and a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
LG Velvet features a greater memory to store more games and applications than LG Q70, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 128 GB internal memory. The LG Velvet has a little longer battery performance than LG Q70, because it has an 8 percent greater battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG Velvet is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.