Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-05-07 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Mirror black | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG Q70 has a score of 77.9, which is slightly better than the Moto Z3's 77.6 overall score. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but LG Q70 has an older 10 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though the LG Q70 is newer than the Moto Z3, it is noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a bit better display than LG Q70, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher display density. LG Q70 and Moto Z3 both feature really similar storage capacity for games and applications, both have a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and equal 64 GB internal storage.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a bit faster processor than LG Q70. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. LG Q70 has a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG Q70 also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera, a bigger back camera sensor and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography.
LG Q70 features longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although LG Q70 is a better device, it costs more money than the Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z3. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the LG Q70, otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto Z3, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.