Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mirror black | Blue and Brown |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 398 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has a global score of 80.7, which is a bit better than LG Q70's global score of 77.9. Motorola One Vision's body is just a little bit lighter than the LG Q70, although it is just a little thicker and was released a bit more further than a year before. Motorola One Vision has just a bit better display than LG Q70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher screen pixels density and a bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a bit faster processing unit than LG Q70. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. LG Q70 counts with just a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola One Vision, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One Vision captures just a bit better photos and videos than LG Q70, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola One Vision also has a lot higher resolution camera, a way larger back camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light situations.
LG Q70 counts with a little better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.