Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mirror black | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is slightly better than LG Q70, with an 80 score against 77.9. Although Motorola One Zoom and the LG Q70 were only released with a couple months difference, the Motorola One Zoom body is just a little thicker but also just a little bit lighter. Motorola One Zoom and LG Q70 feature extremely similar CPUs, they have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Motorola One Zoom features a screen that's very similar to LG Q70's screen, and although the Motorola One Zoom has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite better screen pixel density, they both have a same size display. The LG Q70 counts with a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One Zoom captures a bit better photographs and videos than LG Q70, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola One Zoom also has a back camera with lot more mega pixels, a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video and a much larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos.
The Motorola One Zoom features a battery lifetime that is very similar to the LG Q70 one.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is more expensive than the LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Q70. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Motorola One Zoom, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG Q70, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.