Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-07 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Mirror black | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is better than LG Q70's global score of 77.9. Even when the Motorola razr (2020) and the LG Q70 were only released 5 months apart, the Motorola razr (2020) is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner. Both devices in this review include Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has a newer 11 version while LG Q70 has Android 10.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a little better processing power than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory. LG Q70 has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a little higher count of pixels in each screen inch, a quite better 1080 x 2310 pixels resolution and a quite larger display.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a bit better camera than LG Q70, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger camera aperture for better captures and video in low light situations, a way more MP camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
The LG Q70 has more memory for apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG Q70 features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 43% more battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Q70. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the LG Q70, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.