Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-07 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Mirror black | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 398 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is a little bit better than LG Q70, with an 80.8 score against 77.9. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Nokia XR20 has a more recent 11 version while LG Q70 has Android 10 version, offering some extra features and performance enhancements. Even though the Nokia XR20 is newer than LG Q70, it is extremely thicker and heavier.
Nokia XR20 counts with a little sharper screen than LG Q70, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit larger screen. LG Q70 features slightly more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia XR20, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Nokia XR20 counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Nokia XR20 also has a greater amount of RAM. Nokia XR20 has a slightly better camera than LG Q70, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Nokia XR20 also has a larger back camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality, better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Nokia XR20 counts with a bit superior battery life than LG Q70, because it has a 16 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG Q70. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Nokia XR20, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG Q70, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.