Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-07 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mirror black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30s is just a bit better than the LG Q70, having a score of 79.8 against 77.9. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A30s has 11 version and LG Q70 has Android 10 version, providing the user a couple additional features and enhanced performance. Galaxy A30s's construction is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than LG Q70, even when both of them were released only a few months apart.
LG Q70 features a sharper screen than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG Q70 also has a way better 1080 x 2310 resolution and a greater screen pixels density. The LG Q70 features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A30s. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
LG Q70 captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera with lot more mega pixels. The LG Q70 features a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A30s, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG Q70 and Samsung Galaxy A30s count with very similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.