Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-07 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mirror black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is just a bit better than the LG Q70, with an 81.3 score against 77.9. Galaxy A31's design is just a bit thicker but a little lighter than LG Q70, and both were released only 0 months apart. Both of these phones have the same Android 10 OS, so both of them should provide the user the same OS features.
Galaxy A31 features a bit better looking display than LG Q70, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy A31 also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a little more pixels per inch of display. The LG Q70 has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG Q70 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Q70 and the Galaxy A31 feature similar processing units, both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy A31 has just a bit better camera than LG Q70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with improved battery performance than LG Q70, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.