Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-07 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Mirror black | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Q70 is a bit better than Galaxy A5 (2017), having a 77.9 score against 75.8. The LG Q70 construction is way newer, but just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy A5 (2017). The Galaxy A5 (2017) features a bit more vivid screen than LG Q70, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density.
LG Q70 has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. The LG Q70 has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Q70 also has 1 GB more RAM.
The LG Q70 counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. LG Q70 takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a much better 3840x2160 video quality, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.